You are reading

Op-Ed: The benefits of the City of Yes Housing proposal

Photo via Getty Images

June 27, 2024 By Richard Khuzami

Most of the media coverage regarding the City of Yes zoning changes, regarding increasing housing, are focused on the negative response from many of the Community Boards from the outer boroughs, especially those especially distant from Manhattan (as of today, we have seen no coverage of CB1 Queens approval of the City of Yes Housing proposal).

However, another view is that the increase in housing is directly related to affordability and is the responsibility for all New Yorkers to support.

One example was during the COVID-19 pandemic. The city lost many inhabitants, which led to an increase in available housing stock. And rents fell significantly, even offering free months. Once people started moving back and available stock decreased, rents jumped up quickly. We can all have theoretical arguments regarding best ways to cut housing costs, but here is a real-world example you can’t deny.

We are a Civic Association on the Astoria waterfront and view this proposal in a positive light.

1. Community Districts 1 and 2 (Astoria/Long Island City) has seen a tremendous amount of new construction, and recent rezonings promise significant increases in our housing stock (such as Astoria Cove, Astoria North, and Innovations Queens; approximately 6,000 apartments).

However, other districts in Queens have failed to provide their fair share of new housing. The NIMBY’s have ruled.

We are more than happy to provide our fair share of new housing. But we need others to meet their responsibilities!

The City of Yes spreads out new housing throughout the borough and takes into account transit and infrastructure limitations. We strongly support this approach. Our neighborhood suffered redlining starting in the 1930’s. We should not have to suffer through this modern version.

2. Some have suggested area rezonings are a better way to go, and we are strongly in support of such approaches to make sure non-conforming buildings are not an impediment to growth. But this does not deal with the inevitable NIMBYism which would accompany such zoning studies.

3. We also view positively the ability to legalize basements and separate structures on your land based upon any environmental and safety restraints. And conversion of commercial to residential buildings makes sense, especially to provide entry level affordable housing to young people and immigrants, the
lifeblood of continued economic and cultural growth in our great city. However, we also feel that property taxes need to be addressed. We don’t want high tax increases to act as a disincentive to taking advantage of these opportunities.

4. One area we disagree with the proposal: Any private structures built on NYCHA property needs to be affordable to current NYCHA residents. With such huge estimates for NYCHA repairs, new buildings may be more affordable, and provide better housing if rent requirements remain the same.

With everyone pulling together, there is no limit to what we can accomplish. But with everyone just supporting their own selfish interests, our future as the greatest city in the world will become a distant memory.

 

*Richard Khuzami is the president of the Old Astoria Neighborhood Association, which seeks to promote economic growth, quality of life and cultural health in the Astoria neighborhood.

email the author: news@queenspost.com

2 Comments

Click for Comments 
homeowner

City of Yes is designed to destroy the character of lower-density outer borough neighborhoods. What might work in Astoria won’t work in eastern Queens or similar neighborhoods in Brooklyn, the Bronx and Staten Island.

Brooklyn BP Reynoso is proud of the fact that City of Yes will destroy the character of the nicer outer-boro neighborhoods – http://u.pc.cd/61K7

Reply
Philip Kinscherf

So basically the gist of it is that CB 1 & 2 already made the big mistake of saying yes, so now everyone has to suffer from their poor choices?

Also people are moving to those neighborhoods due to proximity to the city and public transportation, all things that are absent in eastern queens and areas like Throggs Neck where Adams had the bright idea of loading up with housing, but no infrastructure to match.

Combine all the lack of public transportation infrastructure with the loser transplants moving in and then dictating how we should live, by trying to ban vehicles in Manhattan and you have your answer as to why the rest of the city is saying “no” to yes

7
2
Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

Long Islander gets 3-9 years for stealing homes across Queens belonging to elderly or disabled owners: AG

New York Attorney General Letitia James and Queens District Attorney Melinda Katz announced that a Long Island man was sentenced to three to nine years in prison Friday for leading a deed theft ring that resulted in five homes being stolen from vulnerable Queens residents and saw them earn more $1 million in ill-gotten gains.

Marcus Wilcher, 48, of Carll Drive in Bay Shore, pleaded guilty in May to grand larceny in the second degree in Queens Supreme Court for his role in leading the crew following an investigation by the Attorney General’s office.

NYPD searching for burglary crew that targeted nearly 30 laundromats in Queens and others in Brooklyn and the Bronx

Police from the 110th Precinct in Elmhurst are looking for three masked men who broke into Susan’s Laundromat at 85-12 Grand Ave. at around 3:15 a.m. on Monday, June 24, while a fourth member of their crew acted as a lookout near their getaway car parked in front.

The burglars stole $1,800 in cash and removed a payment machine for the laundry room continuing an undetermined amount of cash.