You are reading

Astoria law firm represents woman seeking damages following Starbucks coffee spill

starbucks1Dec. 1, 2014 By Michael Florio

An Astoria law firm representing a woman who claimed that she was burned by a Starbucks coffee overcame a significant legal hurdle in her quest for damages last month.

Devrim Cacin-Worthy, a Flushing resident represented by Sacco & Fillas, claimed in a lawsuit filed in Federal District Court that she bought a regular cup of coffee at a Starbucks in Nassau County in Nov. 2011 and moments later the lid came off and she spilled it — causing severe burns.

In court papers, Worthy admitted she did not know the coffee’s temperature, nor did she check to see if the lid was properly affixed before picking up her drink from the server.

Starbucks filed a motion to dismiss the case to avoid the possibility of a trial. However, Starbucks did not provide sufficient evidence to contradict Worthy’s account, according to District Judge Denis Hurley.

Hurley said that there was enough evidence that “reasonably supports her claim that defendants breached a duty of reasonable care.”

Further, he added, the possibility that Worthy’s own squeezing of the cup causing the lid to come off was “sufficiently remote,” and the facts establish a “reasonable probability that her injury was caused by Starbucks.”

Tonino Sacco, a partner at Sacco & Fillas representing Worthy, said “the reasonable probability is enough to take it to trial.” Nevertheless, “it still has to be proved by a preponderance of evidence; this just allows the case to go to trial.”

Starbucks Case

email the author: [email protected]

2 Comments

Click for Comments 
Anonymous

It goes without saying that when you order a non-specified ICED coffee, that your beverage will be hot…

but because common sense doesnt hold up in court as a defense, isnt this why all cups everywhere have a “caution, contents may be extremely hot” label?? ever since that woman won $10 million from mcdonalds?

Reply
Anonymous

Coffee is a HOT beverage. It’s common sense to be careful when handling it. Another one trying to make money.

Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

3 men sought for armed robbery in East Elmhurst home invasion near LaGuardia Airport: NYPD

The NYPD is looking for three men who allegedly robbed an East Elmhurst man of tens of thousands of dollars during a home invasion early Monday morning.

Police from the 115th Precinct in Jackson Heights responded to a 911 call of an armed robbery at a townhouse located at 108-09 Ditmars Blvd. near 29th Avenue just south of LaGuardia Airport.
The victim had pulled up in front of his home just before 2 a.m. when he was approached by three suspects. One of them pulled out a firearm and forced him inside the townhouse where they stole around $30,000 in cash and a safe that contained an unspecified amount of jewelry, before exiting and driving off in a silver four-door SUV, police said.