You are reading

Plans for Massive Astoria Development Lauded by Business Leaders, Panned by Activists

Site Map (Innovation Queens)

June 16, 2021 By Christina Santucci

Western Queens residents, business leaders, and representatives from community groups and cultural institutions got the chance to weigh in on the proposed Innovation QNS development during a virtual meeting Monday afternoon.

Nearly three dozen people spoke during the two-hour Public Scoping meeting – with many in support of the massive, five-block residential and commercial project on the Astoria/Long Island City border as well as several who strongly opposed the plan.

The project’s developers are seeking approval of their proposed zoning changes to create a special mixed-use district – which would allow higher densities and a wider variety of uses than existing zoning. Their 2.9-million-square-foot plan includes 12 buildings, ranging in height from seven to 27 stories.

The developers submitted an environmental assessment statement in May as part of the environmental review process overseen by the Department of City Planning. Monday’s scoping meeting allowed members of the public to comment as part of this review.

Jerald Johnson of the firm Fox Rothschild gave a presentation to start the meeting on behalf of the development team. He described Innovation QNS – which is a partnership between Kaufman Astoria Studios, Silverstein Properties and Bedrock Real Estate Partners – as “a new vibrant, mixed-use community on what is currently an underutilized five-block area in Astoria.”

Presentation of Innovation QNS at Scoping meeting Monday (Screenshot)

Innovation QNS, which would be built between 37th Street and Northern Boulevard and bounded by 35th and 36th Avenues, would include about 2,800 residential units of various sizes – and house an estimated 8,300 new residents.

Approximately 25 percent of those units – about 711 – would be designated as permanently “affordable” under the city’s Mandatory Housing Inclusion (MIH) program. The developers plan to use MIH Option 1 – meaning that the units would be affordable, on average, to households making 60 percent of the Area Median Income – or $64,440 for a family of four in 2021.

Along with the 2.4 million square feet of residential space, the development would have about 250,000 square feet of office space and about 209,000 square feet of commercial space for retail, restaurants, a grocery store and the relocated multiplex movie theater, which currently is on 38th Street, the EAS documents show.

The plans also include about 108,000 square feet for community uses, like a daycare, community center and performing arts center, and 2.3 acres of publicly accessible open space.

Opponents of the Innovation QNS criticized the plan’s potential impact on local infrastructure. They also suggested that the project would gentrify the area, causing some current residents and businesses to be pushed out.

They also said the income requirements for “affordable” apartments would be out of reach of many neighborhood residents.

But proponents praised the development as a way to revitalize an underutilized section of Astoria, create new jobs and provide much-needed housing in western Queens.

Queens Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Tom Grech expressed his “unequivocal support” for Innovation QNS. The chamber represents about 1,400 businesses and 150,000 Queens-based employees, he said.

“At a time when Queens restaurants, shops, boutiques and other small- and medium-sized businesses are struggling to recover from a year of shutdowns and reduced business, Innovation QNS presents our borough with an excellent opportunity to secure investment for this community,” Grech said.

Grech said that similar developments have been a boon to local businesses, and cited projections by the developers that Innovation QNS would lead to an additional $50 million annual spending in the neighborhood.

“Anyone who is an advocate for the small businesses on Steinway Street, most certainly is an advocate for Innovation QNS,” Grech said.

The developers also estimate the project would create 1,700 permanent jobs and 3,400 construction jobs.

Presentation of Innovation QNS at Scoping meeting Monday (Screenshot)

Carl Goodman, executive director of the Museum of the Moving Image, said he believed Innovation QNS would help the museum to expand its impact as the neighborhood’s anchor cultural institution.

“We would be hesitant to support this project as presented if it were not led by Kaufman Astoria Studios. They are the real deal,” he said. “Most important, they have served as a good and beneficent neighbor to a broad array of nonprofits and arts organizations in Queens.”

Innovation QNS developers are touting the project as expanding on the nearby Kaufman Arts District as well as cultural institutions like MOMI and the Frank Sinatra School of the Arts.

Other voices in support included Seth Bornstein, executive director of the Queens Economic Development Corporation; Charlie Samboy, director of governmental affairs at New York Building Congress; and Nina Fiore, founder and executive director of Astoria Film Festival.

Representatives from Astoria-based HANAC – originally the Hellenic American Neighborhood Action Committee – and Zone 126, a nonprofit that works with children and families in Long Island City and Astoria, also spoke in favor of Innovation QNS.

Speakers during the first 90 minutes of testimony all said they backed the project – but critics contended that those sentiments were not commonplace throughout the community. Opponents also said that they had not received notice of the meeting beforehand.

“I find it deeply problematic that this meeting so far has been completely stacked by the developers and filled with supporters when I know that is not the sentiment amongst many of my neighbors,” said Laura Shepard, a member of Community Board 2 who spoke on her own behalf.

Shepard also said she did not support the inclusion of close to 1,600 parking spaces.

Evie Hantzopoulos, a City Council candidate for Astoria’s District 22, said many Astoria residents do not earn enough to quality for the “affordable” housing. She also pointed to the potential impact of the development on neighborhood sewers, schools, utilities and rental prices.

“We have already seen our storefronts and our commercial spaces – people getting pushed out because of gentrification and speculation,” she said.

Hantzopoulos added that while she supports many of the arts and neighborhood organizations whose representatives spoke in favor of the project, she was disappointed by them, saying that “they are testifying in support and not pushing back to get more for our community.”

City Planning officials said written comments and testimony about Innovation QNS will be accepted through Thursday, June 24. Comments can be submitted by mail and to the email address: [email protected].

If approved during the ULURP rezoning process, construction could begin in 2023 and is expected to be completed in 2032.

email the author: [email protected]

12 Comments

Click for Comments 
Theodore Herzl

This is a done deal and there’s nothing you plebes can do about it. Keep wallowing in your eternal adolescence while the Democrats you so eagerly elect continue to sell you out. Enjoy!

5
1
Reply
your_neighbor

Have any of you commenters been to that part of Astoria? It is filled with run down warehouses, many abandoned many years ago by Queensboro Farms. It is a place you wouldn’t really want to walk around at night.
Redeveloping this part of the neighborhood to bring in more residents with disposable income would only help the existing businesses and restaurants in the vicinity.
The scale of 200+ foot buildings is probably too big but that is most likely a negotiating tactic and smaller buildings will probably be agreed to.
It looks like this is going to have the anti development people coming out of the woodwork.

3
2
Reply
John Doe

These developers and city leaders buying up different blocks in the area and pushing those hard working people out is terrible. In the same motion these are saying they are providing affordable housing to those who qualify. That’s the number one problem these developers think 50k and more is considered to be affordable when the average income in the area is that same amount. The area and community can’t not stand by and let these vultures come and push out of our community and cause gentrification this is going to stop one way or another. Strength in numbers will always win.

1
3
Reply
Pat Macnamara

She also pointed to the potential impact of the development on neighborhood sewers, schools, utilities and rental prices LMAO right Evie who has been the invisible woman for years all of a sudden cares. This development has graft written all over it. But let’s keep those developers and politicians wealthy.

3
1
Reply
Dominique Weinberger

This, like most projects in the city don’t respect the sentiment of the community at large where the sites are proposed. Developers have little regard of the existing community because there’s no monetary profit in it. Astoria is a solid working class neighborhood, there’s no money in that. Taking existing structures, considerate of its populace, their needs, income, and needs isn’t profitable for developers. There will not be affordable housing for the community, it will become another LIC. This is pure unadulterated gentrification. It no longer matters what the neighborhood wants, the deal has been consummated in the name of “progress”,. When local politicians and developers propose a well conceived, carefully worked proposal, the deal already is sealed with $$$$ having passed around. While people were busy navigating Covid, we now know what the developers were busy doing. This like so many things that give the working class no power is so easy when the money is slapped on the table first. Our politicians will do nothing simply because there’s no monetary incentive for improvement, only for new construction. If improvement were the consideration it would already be in the works. This is now prime real estate, close to the city with transportation, close to the East River, Brooklyn, and highways and airports to everywhere. City and developers have been keen on figuring out ways to get many of our housing units privatized, some of whom sit on waterfront sites. It’ll happen, regardless of protests, because the money to be made is just too appealing. We can organize, protest, vote in attractive political voices, but redevelopment will continue because the poor have no money, no money means no power. That’s the sad reality of our country. I’m happy I grew up in a neighborhood but I’m saddened knowing that future generations won’t ever get to experience that.

8
4
Reply
The facts

Actually taken as a whole, Astoria is one of the higher income areas in Queens. “Working class” is a label that fits a few smaller sections but the neighborhood is solidly middle class and upwardly mobile. This is confirmed by census statistics and other reputable sources like Furman Center. It is a high opportunity neighborhood with good schools, excellent transportation in most areas, and proximity to many good employers. Antidevelopment arguments that use some assumption that this is a historically underserved neighborhood are in bad faith and gatekeeping.

3
1
Reply
Dale

If the zoning was as-of-right then fine, but this development doesn’t sound like anything so special and beneficial to the neighborhood or borough that the developers should get a bonanza windfall with rezoning to their liking.

7
2
Reply
Sara Ross

ENOUGH ALREADY!!! Queens doesn’t need anymore residential buildings!!!!!!! We need diners, stores, small businesses. Not big corporations ruining neighborhoods that they don’t even live in and have probably never walked around.

9
4
Reply
COCED

Don’t diners, stores, and small business come to where the residential buildings are? I mean there should be a reasonable proportion of both sides, eh?

1
1
Reply
Home owners against affordable housing

Hantzopoulos, who owns a home nearby, is playing the “leftist NIMBY” playbook in which no concessions (affordability, community inclusion, etc) will ever be enough. The truth is she is a privileged home owner who benefits directly from suppressing any new density in her neighborhood with a skyrocketing home value and artificially low residential property taxes. Bad faith and gross to see.

5
3
Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News