You are reading

Op-Ed: Innovation Shouldn’t Mean Gentrification

Rally at City Hall regarding Innovation QNS project (Photo by: Marc Safman)

Nov 15, 2022 Op-Ed

What does it mean when 91% of the new housing in your community is unaffordable to lower income communities that live there and throughout our City?

What does it mean when billionaire developers neglect to do meaningful outreach to immigrant groups, the disabled, and working class people that will be most impacted by a massive rezoning they have planned?

What does it mean when those very same developers and their supporters call your community decrepit, dangerous, and a bunch of parking lots?

It means erasure. It means displacement. It means Innovation QNS.

But there is nothing innovative about Innovation QNS, a $2 billion 5-block mostly luxury development being proposed in Astoria by Silverstein Properties, Kaufman (really Square One Capital and Heckman Capital), and BedRock Real Estate Partners. Glitzy PR and paid ads can’t hide the widespread community opposition to this project, resulting in 565 people testifying against vs. 83 people in support at the City Council’s Zoning Subcommittee.

Here’s why:

When you build a majority luxury, instead of a majority of deeply affordable housing in a mostly BIPOC, low income area, you are drastically changing the demographics for who gets to live in Astoria in one fell swoop.

Nearly half of the residents in Community Board One are rent burdened and over 47% of residents are low to very low income. In that part of Astoria, the poverty rate is even higher. The City’s own Equitable Development Data Explorer identifies this area as having an intermediate to high risk of displacement due to its vulnerable population and what is their solution? Encouraging billionaire developers to drastically alter the demographics of the community with some “affordable” housing thrown in to make it seem palatable.

A market-rate two bedroom in Innovation QNS would go for $5,000/mo or more, affordable only to families making nearly 3x the median income for the area or over $200,000/yr. A studio? Over $2,430.

Whether it’s 75% luxury currently certified by City Planning (or 60% luxury if they get public subsidies to build more “affordable” units), the imbalance accelerates gentrification and the displacement. In this case, it’s the Latinx community, over 6,000 Bengalis, and working class, disabled, and lower income people who have shown up in the hundreds to testify against Innovation QNS.

A 55% minimum of truly affordable units as demanded by Council Member Julie Won would help mitigate the damage from this proposal but the proliferation of new high-end housing across Western Queens necessitates even deeper levels of affordability.

Instead of taxing billionaires, BILLIONAIRES WANT TO TAX US. The developers are required by law to provide 25% MIH affordable, and a “deal” would give them subsidies to add another 15%.

We FULLY support our taxpayer dollars going to build social and deeply affordable housing, but gifting billionaire developers who aren’t even paying their fair share of taxes? Who cry poverty when asked to add more affordable units without subsidies and won’t build ONE additional unit without taxpayers footing the bill?

Silverstein Properties alone owns and operates a portfolio worth over $10 BILLION. It’s not only insulting, it’s indicative of the power, influence, and greed of big real estate.

This project would be taking critical subsidies away from other affordable projects since there was no increase in housing funding and that money would have to go towards this private project. If the developers were to get subsidies to build an additional 15%, what is the dollar amount? Where is it coming from?

Borrowing from Peter to pay Paul means taking critical funds for nonprofits, community land trusts, and mutual housing organizations that build supportive and social housing to pay billionaires so that they can keep their obscene profit margins.

This is just the start of more predatory rezonings that will destabilize the diversity of Astoria. The zoning the developers are requesting – which currently doesn’t exist in Astoria – is R9. By rezoning to R9 residential, not only will the value of their land skyrocket, it will set a precedent for subsequent rezonings, speculation, and displacement. Rent stabilized housing in the area is NOT safe and can be demolished with an application to build significantly higher than the rent stabilized that exists with astronomical rents.

Redeveloping this area doesn’t boil down to Innovation QNS or nothing. That binary is propaganda to push this development through and so is saying we are “anti-housing”. We’ve been on the ground dealing first hand with the housing crisis.

Astoria has increased its housing supply even as its population has declined but rents have not gone down. Even worse, there have been 17 rezonings since Mandatory Inclusionary housing law was passed in 2016 and not one of those units have been completed. Properties sit undeveloped for years. Many properties have been or soon will be flipped for enormous profit.

Our system is broken and people are hanging on for their lives. It’s time for comprehensive, community-led planning that centers the needs of the most vulnerable and ends speculation which exacerbates displacement. Innovation QNS is a rezoning on harmful steroids. We stand united in demanding more for our community.

Signed,

CAAAV: Organizing Asian Communities

Astoria Not for Sale

Astoria Welfare Society

Hope Justice

Justice for All Coalition

NY Muslim Organizing Collective

Malikah

Woodside on the Move

Western Queens Community Land Trust

 

email the author: [email protected]

9 Comments

Click for Comments 
Charles Castro

When Hipster A holes pay $2000. for a studio, $3000. for a one bedromm, this is what happens.

Reply
Anonymous

Hear, hear!!! This is what so many people seem to be missing – opposition to this project is not about keeping minorities and the working classes out, it’s about protecting and providing for them in ways that billionaires just won’t, because there’s no profit. This project is Hudson Yards East and it will be just a big a joke if it gets competed. A tragic, tragic joke.

A few things to add to this argument: the thousands of square feet of planned office and retail space that we do not need and that could be turned into housing as well – they can’t give away office space in Manhattan and Steinway, Ditmars, Greenpoint Ave all have plenty of existing retail space with for rent signs on it, and you want to build more so it can sit empty too? No thank you.

Then there’s existing “luxury” apartments like The Astor LIC already sitting empty in that part of the neighborhood because they’re overpriced. Don’t need any more, thanks.

Finally, the simple fact that the building tradespeople advocating for this project won’t be able to afford to live there when they’re done building it! I’m a union member, I get it – we all want to work. But you’re literally chasing your membership out of town by building projects like this. The saddest part will be when they put up a rat on Northern Blvd after Silverstein decides that union labor is too expensive and hires a bunch of non-union guys from Long Island and Jersey. Happened at Hudson Yards, it’ll happen here too.

We can have and we should have more housing here. We do not need and do not want investment properties for billionaires. We do not want Hudson Yards East. We need and we want one and two family houses for working class families, apartments for people who make under $100k per year, and affordable housing not based on some jacked up gentrified idea of median area income. Astoria, Sunnyside, Woodside are not LIC in 2002; people live here. You can’t just kick them out and stuff your pockets full of $100 bills while you’re doing it.

4
3
Reply
James

The economics are not there. Which private developer would spend millions to buy those properties and build “one and two family houses”???

If a developer were to buy those properties in order to build “one and two family homes”, they would probably be high end luxury homes that would rent for $10k to $20k a month because that would be the only way the developer “might” make any money.

Astoria is a very desirable neighborhood full of restaurants, cafes, bars that can reach Manhattan by train, bridge or ferry within 10-15 minutes. The cat is out of the bag for Astoria! We cannot stop wealthier people from moving here. One of the few ways to keep Astoria “affordable” for the existing middle class that lives here (other than rent stabilization laws) is by flooding the market with apartments.

3
1
Reply
Stop stopping progress

This is insane. It isn’t propaganda. You will not get development from any group with the demands you all are making. A broken down neighborhood will remain a broken down neighborhood because you want something that no one would ever give you. You are like quibbling with a toddler.

2
5
Reply
Rosamond Gianutsos

Whaaaaat?! The affordable units will be built last. Seriously? Justice delayed is justice denied.

3
1
Reply
Anti-Gentrifier

Gentrification and displacement happens when richer people want to move to a neighborhood, don’t have available housing, and so offer a higher price than existing tenants for their homes.

We cannot stop people from moving here, but we can stop them from displacing us by making sure enough new housing is built to absorb them.

Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

3 men sought for armed robbery in East Elmhurst home invasion near LaGuardia Airport: NYPD

The NYPD is looking for three men who allegedly robbed an East Elmhurst man of tens of thousands of dollars during a home invasion early Monday morning.

Police from the 115th Precinct in Jackson Heights responded to a 911 call of an armed robbery at a townhouse located at 108-09 Ditmars Blvd. near 29th Avenue just south of LaGuardia Airport.
The victim had pulled up in front of his home just before 2 a.m. when he was approached by three suspects. One of them pulled out a firearm and forced him inside the townhouse where they stole around $30,000 in cash and a safe that contained an unspecified amount of jewelry, before exiting and driving off in a silver four-door SUV, police said.