March 16, 2022 By Christian Murray
A dilapidated block of stores on Queens Plaza North are going to be demolished and plans are in place to replace them with a 26-story, residential apartment complex.
The gritty block, located between 27th Street and Crescent Street, has been an eyesore for decades and a developer plans to transform the strip by building a 311 foot tall tower that would come with 417 residential units—124 of which would be deemed affordable– and 7,600 square feet of ground floor commercial space.
The property, with an address of 25-01 Queens Plaza North, is owned Grubb Properties and the company seeks the approval of the City Planning Commission in order to move forward. The plan does not have to go through the full public review process known as ULURP.
Grubb Properties seeks to take advantage of a zoning rule that would give them bonus floor area in exchange for building an elevator and enlarging the staircase at the rundown Queensboro Plaza station. They also plan to replace the existing subway entrance where their Queens Plaza North property is located.
For the improvements, they seek to be rewarded with a floor area bonus of 20 percent. However, the plan is also dependent on them striking a deal with the MTA as well as getting the approval of the City Planning Commission.
Representatives for Grubb Properties went before Community Board 1’s Land Use and Zoning committee Thursday as they seek the board’s backing as they aim to get the project approved.
Without the bonus floor area, the developers would be restricted to a 16-story building, with 343 market rate units. A 16-story residential development complies with existing zoning since the site is located within the confines of the Queens Plaza Subdistrict of the Special Long Island City Mixed Use District, which permits high-density residential and commercial buildings as-of-right.
The development would not include parking, since it is not required by zoning.
The affordable housing being proposed would go up in exchange for a 421-a tax break under the Affordable Housing NY Program. Representatives for the developer told the board that they plan to offer two-thirds of the 124 affordable housing units at 130 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI) and the remaining affordable units at 70 percent AMI.
For a family of four, 130 percent AMI equates to a household income of $155,090, while 70 percent AMI equates to about $83,500.
“You’re going to get pushback on that,” said Richard Khuzami, a community board 1 member told the developers. “So you may want to readdress that. I think the AMI could be a bit more aggressive. It is not going to sit well with either the community or the local politicians in my opinion.”
The proposed station improvements by Grubb will not include an upgrade to the bridge, according to the developer. However, there will be a temporary staircase that runs off the bridge during construction that will take people down to the sidewalk.
Grubb anticipates that it will take 42 months to fully demolish and build the development, which would occur in one phase.
that gritty block of stores served the local community and commuters for decades. Tearing down stores like this and replacing them with legoland skyscrapers is a bigger eyesore. Just another cash grab by developers and yet another sound byte for liberal progressives who will say there isn’t enough affordable housing. A crisis.
As a child (60 years ago), I remember going to the dentist and eye doctor in this building. My father going to the large barber shop. All the family going bowling in the lower level. The many stores, i.e., the men’s shop, candy shop, shoe repair, card store, dress store and delis. The stores changed over the years, but the need was always there to serve the public’s needs. I hope some of those hardworking stores can afford to return when the new building is erected. They “stuck it out” through the years.
Too many giveaways to the developer and the “affordability” is laughable. Grubb wants the huge concession of 20 addition stories on too in exchange having a public staircase that ALREADY EXISTS. Likely it was a lien on the property and would have been required. Another “luxury” project that doesn’t fit local needs. It’s not a building for Astorians or Queens. It’s not approved yet, despite this puff piece, opinions can be expressed to city counsel members.