You are reading

Controversial Power Plant Plan to be Discussed at Online Climate Event TONIGHT

The 15-acre NRG plant in Astoria (Rendering NRG)

Feb. 9, 2021 By Christina Santucci

An Astoria assemblyman is hosting a virtual trivia show tonight – and the daily double will be about a proposal to upgrade a western Queens power plant.

NRG, one of the largest energy companies in the country, is planning to update its Astoria power plant, which the company says will lower emissions, reduce electricity costs and provide jobs.

Several Queens politicians, including Assembly Member Zohran Mamdani, oppose the project since the plan still involves the burning of fossil fuels. Instead, they want the plant to generate power through renewable energy sources.

Tonight’s event, called “Climate (in) Jeopardy!”, will be hosted by Mamdani and will feature Council candidate Tiffany Cabán, author Jaya Saxena and actress and writer Mara Wilson.

NRG plans to replace its 50-year-old power generators at its “peaker” plant in 2023. The plant, located at 31-01 20th Ave., takes up 15 acres within the 300-acre Con Edison complex, bordered by 20th Avenue, the East River and the Steinway Creek.

NRG bought the plant from Con Ed in 1999.

The plan to overhaul the plant is called the Astoria Replacement Project.

Right now, the site has 24 gas turbine units with a capacity of 500 megawatts. NRG wants to replace the units with a single, “state-of-the-art” combustion turbine generator, capable of generating 437 megawatts.

The “peaker” plant’s primary function is to provide power during high — or peak – demand to prevent blackouts, and to support the existing grid in case of emergencies.

Changes to the facility were originally proposed and approved in 2010, but were not completed because of “prevailing market conditions,” an NRG official said. That plan had been for a 1,040-megawatt project, occupying all 15 acres of the site and operating most of the time.

The energy company revised its proposal last year back to a “peaker” plant, and the modified $350-million plan is currently going through an approval process through the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) under the State Environmental Quality Review Act.

During a meeting about the proposal last month, NRG’s Vice President of Development Tom Atkins touted anticipated reductions to greenhouse gases emissions through 2035. He estimated nearly five million tons – or the equivalent of taking 12 percent of the cars registered in Queens off the road – would be reduced through the proposed upgrades.

Officials from the power company also said the plan is expected to reduce electricity costs for customers by $1.3 billion over the first five years. In addition, a study that projected the upgrade would result in $156 million in the state’s economy during the construction phase, as well as 510 jobs during construction and 73 jobs once the facility is up and running.

Although several Queens residents expressed support for “high-paying,” union jobs during the meeting, Mamdani criticized the number of positions that the plant would create.

“Why should Queens even consider choking itself on NRG’s pollution for economic benefits that are either temporary or at a limited scale?” the assembly member asked.

The 15-acre NRG plant in Astoria (Rendering NRG)

NRG officials said their current proposal would use half of their 15-acre site and leave the other half open for possible renewable energy uses.

But State Sen. Michael Gianaris questioned whether the facility would actually switch over to renewable sources such as hydrogen fuel any time soon. “That seems short of a commitment to do anything in the future,” the state senator said.

In response, Atkins said that if the facility doesn’t have zero-carbon emissions by 2040, the plant would have to shut down based on the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act.

Later in the meeting, Council Member Costa Constantinides noted that his son and many other children in Astoria have asthma — a condition linked to air pollution caused by fossil fuels.

“I will again implore you to find another way,” he said. “You delayed the project in 2010, and now you are coming to this community with an outdated project.”

The project was initially approved in 2010 under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, when the regulations used to evaluate power plants required less public participation.

State Sen. Jessica Ramos said she has asked the governor for an enhanced public review process for the proposal under the DEC’s environmental justice policy.

Ramos is adamantly opposed to the plan.

“As long as fossil fuels are being burned in our community, this project is going to remain unacceptable to us — union jobs or not,” Ramos said.

NRG officials said that they recognize the calls for clean energy, but argue that proposed plant–that will be fueled by gas–is needed as a bridge to renewable sources. “The problem is there is going to be a period of transition where we need to have to have gas-fired units to provide backup service at least until 2040,” Atkins said.

Atkins also said that there could be power shortages if the Astoria turbines are retired–as currently planned on May 1, 2023—and not replaced.

“So, if our replacement project does not move forward, something else would have to be done instead to ensure that the lights stay on in New York City,” he said.

However, later in the meeting, Atkins said that existing equipment could possibly be kept running beyond 2023 if needed to address “reliability issues.”

NRG officials said the public will be able to comment on the project during one additional public meeting, which will be hosted by the DEC. The date and time of the meeting has not yet been announced.

In addition, comments and questions can be submitted to the DEC at [email protected].

Those interested in the “Climate (in) Jeopardy!” event from 7:30 to 8:30 p.m. Tuesday, can register at https://bit.ly/climatejeopardy.

Astoria Replacement Project… by Queens Post

email the author: [email protected]

7 Comments

Click for Comments 
Anonymous

Everybody watch Council Member Costa Constantinides and Senator Gianaris screw this up. We have ConEdison and NRG as neighbors and thanks to the dynamic duo, we also have the Sanitation trucks now parked behind our children’s baseball and soccer fields. All these guys (Gianaris, Constantinides) are really good for is losing 25,000 jobs that were guaranteed by Amazon. Stay tuned, NRG will get what they want.

Reply
Jimmy C

Our alleged “community leaders” don’t have a clue, nor a strategy nor a recommendation. They simply know what they do not want, and no good reasoning why they do not want it. Their answer to everything is to do nothing. Just parrot the catch phrases.

Reply
anthony sandman

Get rid of it and make it a park where we could all ride our bicycles in circles and eat tofu and do yoga.

1
3
Reply
Jenastoriat

I have asthma and it got worse when I moved to Astoria years ago. For both the neighborhood and the planet, this facility needs to cease burning fossil fuel and transition to sustainable, non polluting power. IMO this may mean taking it and other plants out of the private sector.

4
11
Reply
Jimmy C

what is this non fossil fuel burning “sustainable, non polluting power” that you refer to? Is it enough to keep all the lights on and power the tons of electric vehicles that is about to come on line?

Reply
your_neighbor

For those who insist on making this a renewable energy plant, I expect you’d need to at least double the acreage of the facility if you want to have solar. I also expect that wind power would not be viable at this location. Nuclear will never fly, hydrogen is a joke – maybe 20 years away and then you have the issue of storing or producing explosive hydrogen onsite. The proposed state of the art gas turbines seems like the only way to both prevent brown-outs and black-outs while still cutting pollution at this site for the next decade or two until less polluting sources come online in the next generation.
It would be great of our political “leaders” understood a little about science, math and economics before opposing any improvement.

14
4
Reply
Khalid

This is absurdity. They ask for a power plant using renewable resources and then saying ‘why should Queens even consider choking itself on NRG’s pollution for economic benefits that are either temporary or at a limited scale?’ – the renewables are also polluting, are they not? Then they reject the company’s plan without bringing an alternative company with a plan to the table. These obstructionist politicians don’t benefit queens at all. Queens residents will be paying higher energy prices because of these politicians.

14
4
Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

Op-Ed: This Year’s State Budget Must Prioritize Climate, Jobs, and Justice for New York

Op-Ed, Jan. 30, By Assemblymember Jessica González-Rojas

In a time of rampant economic inequality and environmental injustice, it is easy to feel defeated.  Here in Queens and across New York State, however, communities are organizing for a better future. New Yorkers from different backgrounds and with different lived experiences are proving that we can build community, organize, and create a future that reflects our shared values.